Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted 2 months ago

Responsive Product Preview Card

P
Heath Babb•60
@hbabb
A solution to the Product preview card component challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

During this project, I focused on implementing a clean component structure using BEM methodology in SCSS. I organized my styles modularly by separating the reset, variables, and utility classes into their own files.

I'm particularly proud of my responsive image handling, which switches between desktop and mobile versions based on screen size:

<picture className="product-card__image">
    <source srcset="{DesktopProduct}" media="(min-width: 40rem)" />
    <img src="{MobileProduct}" alt="Product" />
</picture>

The BEM methodology helped me create maintainable CSS with clear parent-child relationships:

.product-card {
    &__content {
        // Content styles
    }

    &__button {
        // Button styles

        &:hover {
            // Hover state
        }
    }
}
What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

Learning proper BEM methodology with nested CSS variables in SCSS. The documentation for SCSS is not well laid out. I ended up using Ai to help me parse through the documentation and understand how to setup the file structure and learn the best practices. Overall, a fun little practice project. I'm not sure if I like SCSS or TailwindCSS better.

What specific areas of your project would you like help with?

In future projects, I'd like to further explore:

  • TypeScript integration for component props
  • Creating more reusable components
  • Implementing better accessibility practices
  • Exploring animation and microinteractions
Code
Select a file

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

  • Marzia Jalili•9,130
    @MarziaJalili
    Posted 2 months ago

    Fantasticoo! 💯

    A tiny tweak?

    ✅ Consider adding some padding to the page (rhymes very well 😅) for the mobile to sharpen the beauty of the web even more.

    ✅ Example:

    body {
      padding: 4rem 2rem;
    }
    

    Other than that, the web looks great!

    😎😎😎

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord
Frontend Mentor logo

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub