Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted almost 2 years ago

Repsonsive results summary component (no figma file)

Anthony Nanfito•120
@ananfito
A solution to the Results summary component challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


After spending the past few months deep-diving into React, I decided to go back to basics and built a webpage with HTML, CSS, and (vanilla) JavaScript. I wanted to refresh my memory on the foundations. I'm feeling pretty confident about this build which is either a good thing or a bad thing. 😅 Hopefully, it's a good thing.

However, if there's something I could have done better or differently with this build, I'm open to hearing about it. Thank you.

Code
Loading...

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

No feedback yet. Be the first to give feedback on Anthony Nanfito's solution.

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord
Frontend Mentor logo

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit 1st-party linked stylesheets, and styles within <style> tags.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.