Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted 14 days ago

Accessible Rating Component with Next.js

accessibility, framer-motion, next, tailwind-css
Arash Asghari•220
@AriArash44
A solution to the Interactive rating component challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

I'm proud of utilizing Next.js components and server-side rendering (SSR) for both component rendering and data fetching. Exploring these features has been a valuable learning experience, and I see great potential in further optimizing performance and scalability using Next.js.

Additionally, I am pleased with my efforts to follow accessibility best practices, ensuring that the component provides a seamless experience for all users. This aspect is particularly important as accessibility remains a crucial part of modern web development.

For my next project, I plan to explore Angular to gain foundational knowledge of another framework and broaden my skill set.

What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

One challenge I faced was handling error messages in Next.js Server Components. When an API request fails due to a backend issue, Next.js does not allow direct error message retrieval within Server Components. Instead, in production builds, Next.js returns a generic error:

"An error occurred in the Server Components render. The specific message is omitted in production builds to avoid leaking sensitive details. A digest property is included on this error instance which may provide additional details about the nature of the error."

This restriction prevents direct display of backend error messages to the user, making error handling more complex. currently I leave that with the generic error message, but I'm looking for a backend side solution for that (errors happen 10 percent of the times here for testing purposes)

I feel this limitation reduces flexibility in error reporting, and it would be preferable if developers had greater control over how these error messages are surfaced in production.

What specific areas of your project would you like help with?

I'm always looking for suggestions on best practices, in this project especially for:

  • Next.js improvements, specifically better strategies for managing Server Component errors in a way that doesn’t disrupt user experience
  • Accessibility enhancements, making sure my implementation aligns with WCAG guidelines and utilizes ARIA attributes effectively

Any insights or recommendations would be greatly appreciated!

Code
Select a file

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

  • Paul•240
    @devPauloski
    Posted 13 days ago

    Well done, your solution is close to the design, and the layout looks good. I would recommend using max-width on the main element instead of a fixed width. Fixed width on the main container can cause a horizontal scrollbar on smaller screens, but max-width lets your element shrink while preventing it from getting too big elsewhere. Good job!

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord
Frontend Mentor logo

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub