Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted 8 months ago

article-preview-component

sass/scss
TornikeTt•300
@TornikeTt
A solution to the Article preview component challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

The most noticeable challenge I encountered while doing this project was calculating the share button's position. My first thought was to use position: absolute for the media container and position: relative for the share button. However, when it came to the mobile layout, I needed to calculate the full width, and in that case, the first approach wasn’t effective.

My second thought was to use the getBoundingClientRect() function to calculate the share button's position first and then calculate the full container's position on mobile devices. But I encountered some bugs when it came to resizing and clicking, and I also faced some issues with the overflow method.

Finally, I created two media containers: one for the desktop layout and the other for the mobile layout.

What specific areas of your project would you like help with?

So, to overcome and complete this challenge, I created two media containers:

  1. The first one is for the desktop layout, which I placed inside the tag. (This is because when the media container becomes position: absolute, I want the share button—also inside the tag—to be positioned relative to it and correctly calculate the position to center the media container.)

  2. The second one was placed outside the tag (as a sibling of ). I did this to calculate the 's width and position, which I used to determine the media container's position for the mobile device layout.

Question: Is this approach—creating two similar elements and showing one while hiding the other at different times—considered bad practice?

Code
Select a file

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

No feedback yet. Be the first to give feedback on TornikeTt's solution.

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.