Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted 7 months ago

Article Preview Component with React, Tailwind CSS, and Rsbuild

tailwind-css, react
Thomas Weitzel•170
@thomasweitzel
A solution to the Article preview component challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

I’m particularly proud of how the "speech bubble" component turned out. It visually enhances the design and adds an interactive touch to the application. I also feel accomplished in implementing responsive behavior with React hooks like useState and useEffect, allowing the component to dynamically adjust based on media queries.

What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

One major challenge was figuring out how to react to media query changes in a React application. React’s declarative nature doesn’t inherently respond to such events, so I had to dig into how the window.matchMedia API works and integrate it with React hooks. Another challenge was styling the "speech bubble" component to look good, which required trial and error with CSS positioning and pseudo-elements.

For the media query handling, I used useEffect and addEventListener to set up a listener for changes in the query’s state, ensuring the component re-renders appropriately. For the "speech bubble" styling, I sought inspiration from online tutorials and experimented with different approaches, eventually landing on a solution using Tailwind CSS.

What specific areas of your project would you like help with?

Styling the "Speech Bubble" Component: While functional, the implementation feels overly complex. I’d appreciate advice on making it more intuitive and scalable using modern CSS techniques.

Responsive Design Patterns in React: I’d like to explore more efficient or idiomatic ways to handle responsive layouts and media queries in React, maybe without relying on window.matchMedia.

Accessibility Enhancements: I’ve added ARIA labels and semantic elements, but I’d welcome a review to identify any overlooked accessibility issues or opportunities for improvement, especially for screen reader users.

Code
Select a file

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

  • Mehmet Aydar•280
    @MehmetAydar01
    Posted 6 months ago

    good work

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord
Frontend Mentor logo

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub