Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted 3 months ago

Attempt at resolution Product preview card component

Norton-Vinicius•90
@Norton-Vinicius
A solution to the Product preview card component challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

In fact, I had a lot of difficulty with this challenge. However, what I'm most proud of was the text part and since I've been using flexbox, I believe I'm doing well.

What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

The biggest challenge I encountered was how to place the image next to the text. I managed to leave it without the white margins, however, I would have to remove all the padding I defined (I don't know if I solved it in the best way, but it was the way I found).

What specific areas of your project would you like help with?

I would like you to evaluate my solution, tell me if this was one of the ways to solve the challenge and if so, where I could improve or do something different. I also had some difficulty in changing the desktop image to the mobile image, I used chatGPT to help me clear up doubts, but I still don't understand very well.

Code
Select a file

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

  • Art0fMind•90
    @art0fmind
    Posted 3 months ago

    Your code is clean, well-structured, and follows good HTML and CSS practices. 👍 Positive points:

    Semantic elements are used properly (main, picture, h1, etc.)

    Responsive design handled well with @media

    Clean separation of HTML and CSS

    Fonts and colors ensure good readability

    🛠️ Minor improvements:

    The href="*" should be replaced with "#" or a real URL to avoid errors

    Use a <button> instead of <a> for the "Add to Cart" (better for accessibility and semantics)

    In the CSS: html, body { height: 100%; } — make sure the body doesn’t overflow if the content gets taller than the viewport

    Marked as helpful

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub