Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted about 1 year ago

Blog preview card main

Chai•450
@chaithawat21
A solution to the Blog preview card challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)
Code
Select a file

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

  • P
    Øystein Håberg•13,260
    @Islandstone89
    Posted about 1 year ago

    HTML:

    • Every webpage needs a <main> that wraps all of the content, except for <header> and footer>. This is vital for accessibility, as it helps screen readers identify a page's "main" section. Change .main to .card, and wrap it in a <main>.

    • "Learning" and "Gary Hooper" are <p> elements. They would not be <h5>if they were headings, as headings must be in order.

    • I would wrap the date in a <time> element:<p>Published <time datetime="2023-12-21">21 Dec 2023</time></p>.

    • .attribution should be a <footer>, and you should use <p> for the text inside.

    CSS:

    • Including a CSS Reset at the top is good practice.

    • Add around 1rem of padding on the body, so the card doesn't touch the edges on small screens.

    • Remove the margin on the card.

    • To center the card horizontally and vertically, use Flexbox on the body:

    display: flex;
    flex-direction: column;
    justify-content: center;
    align-items: center;
    min-height: 100svh;
    
    • Except for on .avatar, remove all widths.

    • I wouldn't use % for margin, padding.

    • Add a max-width of around 20rem on the card, to prevent it from getting too wide on larger screens.

    • font-size must never be in px. This is a big accessibility issue, as it prevents the font size from scaling with the user's default setting in the browser. Use rem instead.

    • Add display: inline-block on "Learning".

    • I'm not sure media queries are needed on this project. When they are, they should be in rem, and we usually style for mobile as the default.

    Marked as helpful

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord
Frontend Mentor logo

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub