Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted about 1 year ago

Social Links Profile - w. hover animation

animation, accessibility
SaruMakes•160
@SaruMakes
A solution to the Social links profile challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

I'm most proud of how close to the original design I was able to get, using only images. I'm also quite proud of the little hover animation I created, and how I feel like I'm getting better and quicker at making these things. I'm definitely experiencing far fewer hiccups along the way, which is encouraging.

I created this using Flexbox and I am feeling fairly comfortable with it by now. However, I have yet to really delve into CSS Grid, and I feel like that is definitely something I need to learn more about, as I understand it is used to style and organise layouts as well.

I would also like to get better at using Figma, as I'm not particularly skilled at using it yet, and I'm sure there are better ways to use it, than how I used it for measuring the design elements (based purely on the pictures provided).

What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

Initially I'd created the links using s and 's nested inside, but the hover state animation was causing me trouble, as I couldn't get it to change the text color as well. I then troubleshooted the issue and read up on how to work with buttons, where I learned how to style a button better, as well as learning that it's better to not use ``'s at all for external links, as it can be confusing for users of assistive technologies.

I was also struggling with the centering of the component on the live page, but I was able to troubleshoot it with Dev Tools, and found that the lack of vertical centering was due to the main container matching its height to that of the component. Adding height: 100vh; fixed this issue.

Curiously, the links in the attributions footer don't show as clickable in my VS Code preview window, but they work perfectly fine on the live page. I'm not sure why that is, but I haven't looked into it further. I use the Codeswing extension in VS Code, to give me a live preview of my pages as I work on them.

What specific areas of your project would you like help with?

As always, I'd love feedback on my HTML code regarding the structuring and semantics. I'm still very much trying to learn the best way(s) to work with semantic HTML.

Also, if there's anything in my CSS code that stands out to you, as something I could improve or something that seems strange to you, I would love to know!

Code
Couldn’t fetch repository

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

  • Koda👹•3,830
    @kodan96
    Posted about 1 year ago

    hi there! 👋

    A couple of tips I packed up for you:

    HTML:

    • your anchor tags should be placed in an ul and li tags:
    <ul>
      <li><a href="#">Github</a></li>
      ....
    </ul>
    

    this provides your page more semantic meaning

    CSS:

    • use min-height instead of height on the body tag. using height prevents users who open your page on device with smaller screens to scroll down if your content overflows the 100vh

    • don't apply width or height to your elements explicitly, they will adapt to their content's size by default. you can use max-width to create a gap for the width:

    .element {
      width: 90%;
      max-width: 66rem;
    }
    

    in this case .element will take up 90% of the container's width, but won't expand above 66rem (notice that I used relative units in both case instead of pixels)

    Hope this was helpful 🙏

    Good luck and happy coding! 🙌

    Marked as helpful

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord
Frontend Mentor logo

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub