Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted 3 months ago

Browser Extensions Manager

react
Andrew•420
@timshandrew
A solution to the Browser extension manager UI challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

This was my first project in some time and I am happy that I have remembered a lot. The implementation is a little rough around the edges but I plan to come back and do a lot of refactoring.

The component break-down could have been done better. The CSS could have also been made cleaner and more consistent. I did not have much a consistent approach when using CSS selectors; sometimes I used class names, whilst other times I used a combination of class names and element selectors. I plan to try my hand at Tailwind very soon and think this will result in a more consistent approach.

What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

I was having trouble with my font resource loading in the deployed version. At first I was confused and thought it could have been a problem with Vite's resource management during the build step. I have generally included locally stored fonts in the public folder. In this project I decided to experiment with using the /src/assets folder more in order to better take advantage of build optimisations. Vite 'fingerprints' filenames, as well as relocates them during build. I understood that this is handled when we import resources in JS but was unsure if it was handled by referencing a resource in a CSS src: url(). It turns out that it is handled and my problem was in fact due to a filename (unrelated to the fingerprint); it was just due to a mismatch in capitalization between the CSS src and the actual resource.

What specific areas of your project would you like help with?

Anything is appreciated!

Code
Couldn’t fetch repository

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

No feedback yet. Be the first to give feedback on Andrew's solution.

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.