Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted 2 months ago

Clock app

Mobina Esmati•360
@mobina-dev-2001
A solution to the Clock app challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

This project took much longer than I expected. I struggled with the APIs provided in the challenge’s README (most of them didn’t work), handling the fallback timezone, the layout, and some of the animations. In the end, I just wanted to get it finished. It definitely still needs some work, but for now, I’m calling it done.

Code
Select a file

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

  • Kim Fransson•420
    @kim-fransson
    Posted 2 months ago

    Hi!

    I understand your feelings when things does not goes as planned, however there is one really important thing I need to point out, and that is that you are storing the api key on client side.

    const quoteDataResponse = await fetch(
            "https://api.api-ninjas.com/v1/quotes",
            { headers: { "X-Api-Key": import.meta.env.VITE_QUOTES_API_KEY } }
          );
    

    When inspecting the network requests, I can see the key being sent directly, which poses a security risk, anyone can extract it and use it to make unauthorized requests to https://api.api-ninjas.com.

    To mitigate this, it's important to treat API keys as sensitive information. They should be stored securely on the server side and accessed through a backend service. The frontend should then communicate with your backend, which can forward the request to the external API as needed. This keeps the API key hidden from end users and helps prevent misuse.

    Since you're using GitHub Pages, I understand there may not be a backend in place. One easy solution is to use a platform like vercel, which allows you to deploy serverless functions. You can create a simple API route there to act as a proxy between your frontend and the external API. This way, the API key is kept secure on the server side, and your frontend only talks to your own endpoint.

    I like vercel, I use it a lot for different projects, it has a very generous free tier :D

    All the best,

    Kim

    Marked as helpful

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub