Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted over 1 year ago

Custom Dictionary app made with React.js

accessibility, react, styled-components, typescript
P
Luciano Lima•1,270
@LucianoDLima
A solution to the Dictionary web app challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


Custom dictionary website. All feedback and criticism are welcome!

Hi all! Been a while since I last submitted a challenge, and I learned a lot the past few months! I decided to modify the challenge, so you will notice my design is slightly different. And I used styled-components because I had never used it before, so I wanted to have the experience!

For starters, I decided to remove the single play-audio button and added a smaller one with the phonetic writing and accent/origin between it. It also renders multiple buttons if there is more than one pronunciation provided. I also tried to add a small animation to the antonym/synonym buttons.

Another change I made, I added a new button right next to the search box, since we're dealing with fetching data, I decided to make so it will not fetch data as you type, as that can be troublesome. There's a way around it by memoizing but I still thought it was better this way, since it's how the other big dictionaries online did it.

One difficulty I've had was the typescript in the useDictionary context. I had to leave the useDictionaryContext() with any as I couldn't figure out what I did wrong.

Code
Loading...

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

  • BrunoMoleta•700
    @brunomoleta
    Posted about 1 year ago

    Hello Luciano,

    I cloned your repo to do a Code Review.

    This is the first PR, I plan to do at least one more, because this was more of a first contact with the project.

    The main thing that's hard to understand is how someone who hasn't done the project is how things are going in Search.tsx.

    It has several functions and as much as they are commented out, it's a bit confusing.

    The first thing I did was to fix the initial state of validation using:

    const [validation, setValidation] = useState<ValidationType>({
        isEmpty: true,
        isValid: false,
        isLoading: false,
        currentWord: “”,
      }); 
    

    You were using undefined if I'm not mistaken. But it's either Empty or not, Valid or not. So the state starts Empty and not Valid [...].

    At the moment the App is broken, but I'll send you the PR anyway so you can follow my line of reasoning.

    In the worst case, if another PR isn't sent and you don't want to merge, which is perfectly acceptable,

    I suggest reviewing the way this state was initialized and simplify the Search.tsx component.

    You would then have to adjust several things.

    Best regards from Brazil, Bruno

    Marked as helpful

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord
Frontend Mentor logo

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit 1st-party linked stylesheets, and styles within <style> tags.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub