Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted 10 months ago

Designo multi-page website

next, tailwind-css, typescript, accessibility
Chermann KING•450
@Chermann-KING
A solution to the Designo multi-page website challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

I think that visually I've respected the Figma model. While using a new technology (Next.js - v14) that I wasn't necessarily comfortable with at first.

What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

What wasn't necessarily easy was perfectly respecting the display of the images and their positioning on the pages according to the Figma model. Those who have already done this challenge can, I hope, give me their opinion on the visual complexity of the project, especially in terms of responsiveness. It's not easy to understand the Image component of Next.js. I also liked the challenge it gave me in terms of making an element appear on the page depending on the path you're on. The use of usePathname instead of useRouter: very technical when I had to reread all the next.js documentation to understand that the use of one or the other depended on the type of application (App Router or Page Router).

What specific areas of your project would you like help with?

I'd like those who used Next.js to show me how they used the Image component? It really wasn't easy for me to use this component to respect the Figma model.

Code
Select a file

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

No feedback yet. Be the first to give feedback on Chermann KING's solution.

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord
Frontend Mentor logo

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit 1st-party linked stylesheets, and styles within <style> tags.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.