Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted over 1 year ago

Flex, Responsive, + some additions

Ryan Abdaul•320
@RyanAbdaul
A solution to the Four card feature section challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


Eventually I completed this design, It was kinda annoying in the beginning, but now I see it so easy, this design can help you to test your html skills, and also can help you to find out if you mastered grid or flex or you didn't, so I highly recommend this design for everyone to do. pls check out my codes and give me your opinion.

Code
Select a file

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

  • Dilhan Boca•220
    @dboca93
    Posted over 1 year ago

    Hey Ryan,

    Hope you're enjoying your experience on Frontend Mentor. Your site is pretty good. However, when the screen size is between 770px and 900px wide (roughly) the creative wide-scrollbar you've created laps over one of the cards. Also, you could maybe use a bit more semantic html in your code.

    If you have time, maybe you could look at my page: https://fm-four-card-feature-eta.vercel.app/

    I believe that CSS Grid works a bit better on this design than flexbox.

    All the best, Please mark this comment as helpful! Feel free to add me on twitter: @dboca93

    Marked as helpful

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord
Frontend Mentor logo

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit 1st-party linked stylesheets, and styles within <style> tags.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub