Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted 6 months ago

FrontEnd mentor Challenge | HTML CSS JS API | Advice generator app

Ramon-Alvez•500
@Ramon-Alvez
A solution to the Advice generator app challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

I'm proud because this is my first site with an API.

Code
Select a file

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

  • Jay Khatri•4,230
    @khatri2002
    Posted 5 months ago

    Hi @Ramon-Alvez!

    The developed solution looks good, and the responsiveness is handled very well!


    I do have a few suggestions for improvement:

    1. Initial Text in the Card

    When the page loads, the card doesn't show any text. Instead of keeping it empty, I think it would be a good idea to call the API when the page loads and show the generated advice initially. You can then update it whenever the user clicks on the button.

    Alternatively, if you prefer not to call the API initially, you could consider providing some placeholder text in the place of advice, such as "Click on the button to generate the advice" or something similar. This will fill the void that appears initially and enhance the user experience.

    1. Preventing Multiple API Calls

    The get API is being called when the button is clicked, but currently, I can click the button multiple times simultaneously, which makes several API calls, even if the previous ones are still pending. This can lead to a flood of requests to the server and potentially cause inconsistencies in the UI (though not in our case right now).

    To prevent this, it’s a good practice to disable the button once it’s clicked and only enable it again once the previous API call is resolved. This way, the user won’t be able to click on it repeatedly.

    Additionally, you could consider using try and catch blocks when calling the API. You can’t always predict how the server will respond, so it's important to handle errors gracefully. Here’s an example:

    const diceButton = document.getElementById('diceButton');
    diceButton.addEventListener('click', () => printAdvice());
    
    async function printAdvice() {
        diceButton.disabled = true;
        try {
            // Call the API here
        }
        catch (error) {
            // Handle the error here
        }
        finally {
            diceButton.disabled = false;
        }
    }
    

    You can style the disabled button using the :disabled CSS selector:

    #card #diceButton:disabled {
        // Apply appropriate style for the disabled button
    }
    

    Also, take note that the hover effect selector #card #diceButton:hover should now be changed to #card #diceButton:enabled:hover. This will ensure the hover effect only applies when the button is enabled.


    The practices mentioned here become particularly useful in more complex projects, and adopting them early on will help keep your code more maintainable and robust.

    Great work so far, and keep going! 🚀

    Marked as helpful

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord
Frontend Mentor logo

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub