Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted over 2 years ago

I used media query for responsive design

accessibility
ata58011•220
@ata58011
A solution to the Product preview card component challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


I did my first project in frontendmentor and that was really good. I will do more

Code
Select a file

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

  • Lucas 👾•104,160
    @correlucas
    Posted over 2 years ago

    👾Hello @ata58011, Congratulations on completing this challenge!

    You've uploaded your solution using codepen and this is nice. But this makes hard to us to analyze your code since this creates a lots of accessibility issuesif you look the solution report panel you'll see that you've ACCESSIBILITY ISSUES 71 and HTML ISSUES 90. This error are not created due your solution, its due the code pen because the report comes from your page.

    My advice for you is to use vercel.com or netlify.com that are really easier platforms for live sites and totally user-friendly, in a matter of 5min your live site is online. All you need to do is to connect the Github account, import the repository and deploy it. Really fast.

    Fixing that you've to update the solution with the new link and we'll be able to see your live site and help you.

    ✌️ I hope this helps you and happy coding!

  • Adriano•42,870
    @AdrianoEscarabote
    Posted over 2 years ago

    Hi ata58011, how are you?

    I really liked the result of your project, but I have some tips that I think you will like:

    1- Every pages needs a <h1> to show which is the most important heading. So replace the <h2> with <h1> and follow the sequence h1-h5

    2- Every page should have one main landmark <main>. So replace the div that wraps the whole content with <main> to improve the accessibility. click here

    3- We have to make sure that all the content is contained in a reference region, designated with HTML5 reference elements or ARIA reference regions.

    Example:

    native HTML5 reference elements:

    <body>
        <header>This is the header</header>
        <nav>This is the nav</nav>
        <main>This is the main</main>
        <footer>This is the footer</footer>
    </body>
    

    ARIA best practices call for using native HTML5 reference elements instead of ARIA functions whenever possible, but the markup in the following example works:

    <body>
         <div role="banner">This is the header</div>
         <div role="navigation">This is the nav</div>
         <div role="main">This is the main</div>
         <div role="contentinfo">This is the footer</div>
    </body>
    

    It is a best practice to contain all content, except skip links, in distinct regions such as header, navigation, main, and footer.

    Link to read more about: click here

    2- Why it Matters

    Navigating the web page is far simpler for screen reader users if all of the content splits between one or more high-level sections. Content outside of these sections is difficult to find, and its purpose may be unclear.

    HTML has historically lacked some key semantic markers, such as the ability to designate sections of the page as the header, navigation, main content, and footer. Using both HTML5 elements and ARIA landmarks in the same element is considered a best practice, but the future will favor HTML regions as browser support increases.

    Rule Description

    It is a best practice to ensure that there is only one main landmark to navigate to the primary content of the page and that if the page contains iframe elements, each should either contain no landmarks, or just a single landmark.

    Link to read more about: click here

    Prefer to use rem over px to have your page working better across browsers and resizing the elements properly

    The rest is great!!

    Hope it helps...👍

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord
Frontend Mentor logo

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit 1st-party linked stylesheets, and styles within <style> tags.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub