Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted almost 3 years ago

Interactive card using Sass

sass/scss
Joatan Carlos•110
@Joatancarlos
A solution to the Interactive card details form challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


In this project I was able to practice concepts of regular expressions and apply Sass. I feel like I need to improve these techniques and make my code cleaner.

What tips would you give me to improve validation, to separate the numbers into groups of 4 and to make the Sass code cleaner?

  const validation = {
        name: /\d/g,
        number: /\D/g,
    } 
Code
Select a file

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

  • Jesse Good•120
    @jessegood
    Posted almost 3 years ago

    Nice solution!

    Here are some tips to improve your code.

    1. To improve validation: It seems you are performing validation on the keyup event. However, the form can still be submitted even if the form is not filled out. I would suggest listening to the submit event, perform validation and only allow submitting the form when there are no errors.

    2. I think learning the built in JavaScript Validation API would be good. For example, you can set the required attribute to input forms and then just check input.validity.valueMissing to see if the field is blank.

    3. Putting numbers into groups of 4: Here is the function I use. You could listen to the input event on your input field and then format the input using the function below.

    function formatCreditCardNumber(num) {
      num = num.split(" ").join("");
      let arr = num.split("");
      let formattedNum = [];
      if (arr.length < 4) return num;
    
      for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
        if (i !== 0 && i % 4 === 0) {
          formattedNum.push(" ");
        }
    
        formattedNum.push(arr[i]);
      }
    
      return formattedNum.join("");
    }
    

    For improving your SASS, I highly recommend looking into nesting to make your CSS more compact and readable: Here is a tiny example using your code. However,

    .container {
      .aside {
        width: 100%;
        height: 40vh;
        background-repeat: no-repeat;
        background-size: cover;
        
        .front-card {
            position: absolute;
            top: 70%;
            left: 10%;
            z-index: 1;
        }
      }
    }
    

    The above compiles to:

    .container .aside {
      width: 100%;
      height: 40vh;
      background-repeat: no-repeat;
      background-size: cover;
    }
    .container .aside .front-card {
      position: absolute;
      top: 70%;
      left: 10%;
      z-index: 1;
    }
    

    Also, to space our your numbers, use font-variant-numeric: tabular-nums;!

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub