Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted over 2 years ago

Interactive rating card using only vanilla html/css/js

vite
CoconutDev13•50
@CoconutDev13
A solution to the Interactive rating component challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


Hey there!

That is my attempt to make an interactive rating card which I think I did it! I'm pretty happy with the result. Although I feel a little bit unsure about the state management I did in javascript and the approach of hiding and revealing sections using Element#attributeToggle method.

Also I modified a little bit the user experience so I did the button disabled and chose that gray color so it might look a little bit different in first look. I think it's a little bit better that the button gets enabled after user pick any number. Also I swapped hover and selected colors because to my mind it makes more sense when selected item has the primary color and hover just a little bit offset-ed color than original

Feel free to criticize my work and suggest to me some small or huge changes in order to make my code better. Thank you in advance!

Code
Select a file

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

  • Gem•120
    @ladyprogrammer
    Posted over 2 years ago

    I like your code, it's clean! You had that all working in just a few lines of code! This makes it easier to maintain and follow the code.

    Yeah I think hiding and showing the sections via hidden attribute is what I also think the cleanest and most elegant solution when just trying to do the two simpler pages with plain HTML - but this is just a personal opinion. We probably would want to use a framework or library like React or Angular to actually help us on more complex approaches to really divide the page into smaller components for multi-page websites. Other approaches I have seen before is to use document.open and document.write (or similar to that) and another is the use of ajax requests to read and insert snippets of HTML pages. Not really that simple as that with just hiding and showing the sections.

    There are also some issues with the validation report - but I will leave you up to it to resolve and figure that out unless you need guidance. I have a feeling you can do these on your own. :D

    In real-time projects, just keep in mind that a dev should strictly follow the agreed behavior and appearance which is defined usually by the UI/UX team/site owner/product owner/other similar persons who is in charge - unless you are given that creative freedom to do so. If you think a behavior or appearance is better (which is usually subjective), it's better feel to talk with the person-in-charge of the design and behavior.

    In my understanding as part of the challenge stated in the Brief section: Your challenge is to build out this interactive rating component and get it looking as close to the design as possible.

    Any assumptions - if you should do one - should not impact the originally approved design and behavior.

    Nice work! I have a feeling you have been coding for a while.

    Marked as helpful

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub