Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted over 2 years ago

Interactive rating component

Jackson Silva•30
@jacks0nsilva
A solution to the Interactive rating component challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)
Code
Loading...

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

  • Jakub Jirous•270
    @jakubjirous
    Posted over 2 years ago

    Hi Jackson,

    Overall, the solution in style.css looks well-written and adheres to some best practices, such as the use of CSS variables and the box-sizing property.

    Here are a few specific comments that could improve the code:

    1) Consider consolidating your font weights: The Overpass font family includes 20 different weights, but you may only need a few of them. Depending on your use case, you might be able to simplify the @import statement and reduce the size of your CSS file.

    2) Use more descriptive class names: The current class names, such as card-one and card-two, are not very informative. Consider using more specific names, such as quiz-card and result-card, to make it clear what each section of the page represents. Consider reordering your properties for better readability. For example, you might group all of the font-related properties together and all of the background-related properties together to make it easier to scan the code.

    3) Use more semantic HTML: The current HTML code doesn't use many semantic elements. Consider restructuring the code to use these elements and make it easier to understand the structure of the page.

    However, other than that, you did an excellent job!

    Cheers, Jakub

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord
Frontend Mentor logo

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub