Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted about 1 month ago

Interactive rating component

Levin Kooss•150
@LevinKooss
A solution to the Interactive rating component challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

I'm most proud of how clean and responsive the final layout turned out, especially on small screens. I also enjoyed the process of getting the rating logic and thank-you state to work smoothly with JavaScript.

If I were to do it again, I’d focus earlier on structuring my CSS better to avoid little tweaks at the end. I’d also spend more time up front planning the JavaScript, rather than fixing things as I went.

What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

One challenge was getting the selected rating button to stay styled correctly after clicking at first, it wasn't keeping the "active" style. I realized I needed to remove the class from all buttons first before adding it to the selected one.

Another issue was that the layout broke slightly between 375px and 480px screen sizes. I solved that by carefully adjusting max-width, padding, and making sure my container respected smaller viewports properly.

What specific areas of your project would you like help with?

I'd love feedback on how I structured my JavaScript, especially if there are cleaner or more scalable ways to handle toggling views and managing state.

Also open to tips on making my CSS transitions and button styling feel more polished and modern.

Code
Select a file

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

No feedback yet. Be the first to give feedback on Levin Kooss's solution.

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord
Frontend Mentor logo

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.