@Galielo-App
Posted
hello Tom,
well, you can do it with position absolute, but there is a better option. look at this example:
<article class="media-today">
<div class="uppear-area>
<h3 class="media-today__heading">Likes</h3>
<object class="social-icon" type="image/svg+xml" data="images/icon twitter.svg">
Icon Facebook
</object>
</div>
<div class="bottom-area>
same thing here
</div>
</article>
.media-today {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
.upper-area {
display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
align-items: center;
}
.bottom-area {
same thing
}
}
happy coding and if i was helpful please upvote my comment :)
@tomthestrom
Posted
@Galielo-App Thx for your comment.
At the end of the day, flexbox is less code in CSS than positioning, but in this case you're creating an extra nesting in the HTML.
I was thinking about a solution using margin-right: auto on the elements on the left and applying flex-basis to the elements with flex-wrap on the container to position them within to avoid nesting and bloating HTML with container elements as seen here. It works and gets the job done, just not that clean in my opinion. Flexbox gives us a lot of ways to do the job.
Thanks for your opinion again,
Tom
@Galielo-App
Posted
@tomthestrom Sure, but the problem is that flex-wrap sometimes can get a little bit buggy. I prefer adding an extra nesting in the HTML so I can have a much robust code and cleaner HTML.
But as you have said, Flexbox gives us a lot of options, that's why i love it :)
happy coding and please upvote my comment if I was helpful :)
