Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted about 1 year ago

Product Preview Card - React & Tailwind CSS

react, tailwind-css
Justin Levy•100
@justinsane
A solution to the Product preview card component challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

I'm proud of the design and how close it resembles the original.

I would employ a system to make it easier to transform the 'large screen' version to a 'small screen' version. This process took me quite a bit.

What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

I had a challenging time reformatting the large screen design to small screen. I'm going to search out a system or method to make this easier.

What specific areas of your project would you like help with?

Ways or tips to simplify the design process for both small and large screens.

Code
Select a file

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

  • Dylan Heslop•2,440
    @dylan-dot-c
    Posted about 1 year ago

    Oh hello there... heard you wanted a better process of turning larger screen designs into smaller one, well... I dont know if this count, but I always(since recently) go for mobile-first solutions(mobile-first desktop-last), they prove to be more efficient from what I have been through so far and I actually like it.

  • Alex•3,130
    @Alex-Archer-I
    Posted about 1 year ago

    Hi!

    I can get you a hint about img tag. There is a picture tag which dynamically switch images according to media conditions.

    <picture>
        <source srcset="mobile.jpg" media="(max-width: 900px)">
        <img src="desktop.jpg" alt="">
    </picture>
    

    There could be different source tags with various conditions. If no one of them matches than img would be rendered.

    Also I'm not sure about a for the button. This project is out from context, but there are two possible situations here - the cart managed on the client side and then data sent to the server after the purchase, or all data about cart changing sent to server immediately. In the both cases there should be button tag (in the second case it would be type=submit button inside the form).

    Hope that helps =)

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub