Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted 4 months ago

Product Preview Card // HTML & CSS

P
Kristian Haug•150
@klhaug
A solution to the Product preview card component challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

Thinking through the entire structure before I even wrote a single line of code. And also keeping the code pretty clean, not using unnecessary class-names and id's.

What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

Not having the proper images delivered. I solved it with using the proper one, and then cropping and scaling it with a container and transform.

What specific areas of your project would you like help with?

How could I make this card even more accessible?

Code
Select a file

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

  • 👾 Ekaterine Mitagvaria 👾•7,860
    @catherineisonline
    Posted 4 months ago

    Hello, Kristian, the solution looks great.

    Here is what I have to share 👇

    1. First, I wonder why you need an extra div around the img tag because it's pretty self-manageable until you plan to add some overlay, for instance.
    2. For the old price, which has a line-through, you can actually use del tag, it would fit here perfectly: <del>$169.99</del>. So you won't need to add extra CSS plus it conveys the semantic meaning of the old price value. You did similar perfectly with <strong>$149.99</strong>.
    3. The cart image in the button doesn't need any alt because technically it's just a decoration. Decoration means that it's just there for the visuals but it doesn't bring any actual importance. If, let's say you had no text there and only an icon and the icon triggered the click, then it would be important. In this case, you can keep it as alt="" but because of this better to add aria-hidden="true" to make sure that screen readers also skip this.
    4. Finally, usually it's better to separate CSS reset into another file but in this scenario, it might not bring a huge difference. Simply, it's always better to separate the concerns.

    Hope any of this helps, nice job 😎

    Marked as helpful
  • Saima Ahmed Sial•1,220
    @saimasial-bit
    Posted 4 months ago

    "Great job on the solution! The layout looks clean and responsive. However, I noticed that you haven't used semantic HTML elements like <article> and <section>. Adding them would improve accessibility and readability. Also, on smaller screens, the text alignment looks slightly off. Adjusting the padding/margins might help. Keep up the great work!"

    Marked as helpful
  • P
    Kristian Haug•150
    @klhaug
    Posted 4 months ago

    Thank you! Fixed it now!

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub