Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted over 3 years ago

Project-7-Social-Proof-Section using HTML CSS & using Flexbox

SUNDARAM DWIVEDI•150
@Sundaram218
A solution to the Social proof section challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


Any Suggestions? Thanks!

Code
Loading...

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

  • Brendan Hyde•330
    @hyde-brendan
    Posted over 3 years ago

    Hey, great start! You handled the most notable part of the design (the offset cards) well, but there's a few immediately noticeable issues I would get on:

    • There's no mobile layout; if you reduce the screen size the reviews' cards will overflow off the screen. The general idea for these sorts of things is to design the page for mobile layouts first, then add media queries to change certain CSS properties when the screen size is larger than a given value.
    • The background patterns provided in the images folder is missing from your design, as are the background color over the 5-star ratings cards.
    • To align the page's content to the middle of the screen one common method is to include the following to your main body element:
    display: grid;
    place-items: center;
    min-height: 100vh;
    
    • For the Document should have one main landmark and All page content must be contained by landmarks warnings, there's a couple of HTML elements that are treated as the "main landmark", including header, nav, main, and footer. For this particular page I would just wrap all your content in a <main> element to resolve that issue.
    • <article> elements should use a heading element to identify the content for it. You can resolve this on .reviewed by making the names of the reviewers a <h2>.

    Hope this helps!

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord
Frontend Mentor logo

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub