Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted about 1 year ago

QR Code Components Design

Fahith K.R.M.•160
@FahithKRM
A solution to the QR code component challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

I am most proud of designing a clean and functional QR code card that effectively encourages users to enhance their front-end development skills by engaging with practical projects. The minimalistic design with a clear call-to-action successfully communicates the purpose, making it easy for users to understand and act upon the message.

If I were to redo this project, I would explore integrating animations or interactive elements to make the design more engaging. Adding subtle animations when users hover over the card could capture attention more effectively and enhance the user experience.

What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

One challenge was ensuring the QR code's readability while maintaining a cohesive design aesthetic. It was crucial to balance the visual elements to avoid clutter while ensuring the QR code was prominently displayed and functional.

To overcome this, I focused on creating ample contrast between the QR code and the background, using a simple color scheme to ensure that the QR code scanner could easily detect and read the code. Testing with different devices and applications helped refine the design to maximize functionality across platforms.

What specific areas of your project would you like help with?
  1. Design Enhancement: I would appreciate feedback on how to make the design more visually appealing while keeping it functional and straightforward.

  2. User Engagement: Suggestions on how to increase user interaction with the card, such as incorporating dynamic elements, would be valuable.

  3. Code Optimization: Advice on optimizing the HTML/CSS code used to create this design, focusing on best practices and performance improvements, would be helpful.

Code
Loading...

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

No feedback yet. Be the first to give feedback on Fahith K.R.M.'s solution.

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.