Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted almost 4 years ago

Responsive component

Jaonary Andritiana•70
@tix04
A solution to the Order summary component challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


Just starting out on frontendmentor and this is my first challenge. Can anyone rate my project from 1 -10 and send me any feedback on any errors you find or any improvements I can make. Whether it is on my naming conventions, How clean my code is, or just improvements to help me become a better developer. Thank you for your time!!

Code
Select a file

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

  • Mohamed ELIDRISSI•435
    @elidrissidev
    Posted almost 4 years ago

    Great start Jaonary! Definitely not bad for a first challenge. Keep it up! Here are some suggestions for you:

    • Avoid using pixels, especially for things like font-size, margin, padding, width, height etc. Reason being is that they don't scale with your browser's font size setting. To verify this, try increasing your browser's font size from 16px to something like 20px and do a comparison between your solution and this site. See how in your solution nothing changes, while in frontendmentor the page sort of zooms in a bit? There will be special occasions where this won't matter, but as a general advice I will suggest that you look into rems and ems.
    • Decorative images that don't add anything to the page content can have an empty alt text as per the W3C Web Accessibility Initiative:

    Decorative images don’t add information to the content of a page...In these cases, a null (empty) alt text should be provided (alt="") so that they can be ignored by assistive technologies, such as screen readers.

    • A very small detail but I'd add a cursor: pointer to the "Proceed to payment" button to give the feedback that it's clickable.

    That's all I have. Good luck to you!

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord
Frontend Mentor logo

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub