Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted 8 months ago

responsive faq page

José Mama•240
@codesByJose
A solution to the FAQ accordion challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

most proud of my use of the forEach method and finally understanding its use case. also i figured out how to make the background take a background image and also plain color.. crazy.. something i almost didnt know.. and it feels good

What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

parameters for the foreach was a lil issue but cheers to figuring it out !

Code
Select a file

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

  • P
    lynx232•190
    @lynx232
    Posted 8 months ago

    "Does the solution include semantic HTML?"

    No.

    1. <div> classes don't count as semantic html. In the future make use of tags such as <header>, <main>, <footer>, <h1> through <h6> to define different titles in the page(like your did for the FAQ) while also keeping that the numbers refer to a hierarchy(so <h1> should best be used once just once, meanwhile <h2> for exemple should be used multiple times for titles of the same importance);

    2. I suggest using <summary>(semantic) for the different titles instead of <div>;

    3. Keep in mind that empty classes such as <div> have no meaning to screen readers.

    "Is it accessible, and what improvements could be made?"

    Not quite. Start attributing classes to your elements(ex: <h1 class=''the name you feel is most fitting'">. Also you can use a naming scheme for subclasses such as <main class=''name of your choice'"> <h1 class=''name of your choice__h1 name of choice'").

    "Does the layout look good on a range of screen sizes?" No.

    1. Make use of media queries for a broader range of screens. For ultrawide make use of background: top repeat-x" so the svg file will stretch along the whole page;
    2. Adjust the font size, padding etc. to better reflect the reference photos provided in the rar file;
    3. Switch from pixel units to em/rem, vw/vh units so you'll have an easier time adjusting for different screen sizes.

    "Is the code well-structured, readable, and reusable?"

    While it is readable and to a certain degree reusable, try to use comments to delimitate different elements of the page in the future(ex: /Paragraphs/).

    "Does the solution differ considerably from the design?"

    Not by much. Just modify the padding down for the body element in css and increase the size of the card.

    Even though you still have a ways to go you should still be applauded for your effort as this is no simple endeavor. My advice is to learn more about html and css in general and to not get fooled by "miraculous" 1h crash courses which promise you to teach you everything there is to know. Make constant effort to improve, don't chase shortcuts and you will surely master web development.

    Best of luck on your journey!

    Marked as helpful
  • tushar-Ruhela•260
    @tushar-Ruhela
    Posted 8 months ago

    yes, solution include semantic HTML yes ,it is accessible, and no improvements would made yes ,the layout look good on a range of screen sizes yes, code well-structured, readable, and reusable No the solution is not considerably differ from the design

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord
Frontend Mentor logo

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub