Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted about 3 years ago

Responsive memory game using React/Material UI/TypeScript

material-ui, typescript, react
Curtis•930
@webguy83
A solution to the Memory game challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


Did everything I could to get it closely resembling the Figma mockups. There was heavy use of Material UI components and theming all throughout the app. I opted not to use the React context API for state management and instead just dealt with some prop drilling. I was sort of 50/50 on it but reading the React docs they recommend all alternatives and using it as a last case scenario when things get very complex. This helps with needless renders and better performance overall. For the icons I loaded a bunch of random ones in from the MUI Icon library. Definitely I recommend people use TypeScript when working with MUI and React. Helps a ton when developing!

Hope to hear all the feedback and recommendations.

Code
Loading...

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

No feedback yet. Be the first to give feedback on Curtis's solution.

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.