Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted 11 months ago

Responsive Product Preview Card Component

jpcardozx•100
@jpcardozx
A solution to the Product preview card component challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

Embarking on the creation of a product preview card component was an exciting challenge that allowed me to blend creativity with technical skill. The project aimed to design a compelling and functional card that serves as a showcase for product details, ensuring that it remains visually appealing and user-friendly across various devices.

Develop a product card that not only looks sophisticated but also effectively highlights the key elements of the product, such as its image, name, description, and pricing. Responsive Flexibility: Create a design that transitions seamlessly between mobile and desktop views, ensuring that the card maintains its integrity and functionality across different screen sizes.

Apply a cohesive design language that reflects modern web aesthetics, incorporating principles of spacing, typography, and color to create a visually pleasing experience.

I delved into Flexbox to achieve a fluid layout that adjusts gracefully to various screen dimensions. This experience significantly enhanced my ability to create responsive designs that look polished on any device.

Implementing media queries provided me with a deeper understanding of how to tailor designs to different resolutions, balancing aesthetics with functionality. Attention to Detail: Focusing on image handling, text styling, and spacing taught me the importance of detail in achieving a balanced and engaging design. Each element, from typography to button styling, contributes to the overall user experience. Areas Where I Need Support:

What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

Ensuring that the product preview card looked consistent and functional across different devices, from mobile phones to desktop screens, proved challenging. The transition between the mobile and desktop views needed to be seamless.

I tackled this by using Flexbox for layout management and media queries to adjust styling based on screen size. By carefully testing the card on various devices and adjusting breakpoints, I ensured that the design remained coherent and visually appealing.

Integrating images in a way that maintained high quality while ensuring they fit well within the card's design was tricky. The images needed to adapt to different screen sizes without distortion or loss of detail.

I employed CSS properties such as background-size: cover and background-position: center for the image container. This approach allowed the images to scale appropriately while preserving their aspect ratio and visual integrity across devices.

The card’s appearance and behavior varied slightly across different browsers, especially concerning Flexbox properties and CSS features.

I conducted thorough cross-browser testing to identify discrepancies and applied vendor prefixes where necessary. Utilizing tools like BrowserStack helped simulate various environments, enabling me to address specific browser-related issues.

Achieving consistent typography and spacing that looked professional and balanced across different screen sizes was challenging. Ensuring text readability and proper alignment was crucial..

What specific areas of your project would you like help with?

I would appreciate feedback on optimizing the responsiveness of the product preview card, particularly regarding how the layout adapts to various screen sizes. Specifically, I’m seeking advice on refining the Flexbox implementation to ensure that the .main-content aligns correctly with the .img-container across all devices, and how to address any potential issues with cross-browser consistency. Additionally, suggestions on improving CSS performance and maintainability, such as better organizing the stylesheet or utilizing advanced CSS techniques, would be valuable. Any insights on enhancing accessibility features, especially for users relying on screen readers, would also be helpful.

Code
Loading...

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

No feedback yet. Be the first to give feedback on jpcardozx's solution.

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord
Frontend Mentor logo

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.