Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted 2 months ago

Responsive Social Links Profile Card with Tailwind CSS

accessibility, tailwind-css
HepinSuthar•30
@hepinsuthar
A solution to the Social links profile challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

✅ What are you most proud of?

I'm proud of how clean and responsive the final result turned out using Tailwind CSS.This was my first time:

Using custom fonts via @font-face

Customizing a Tailwind configuration for colors and fonts

Building a fully mobile-first layout that works on all screen sizes

The hover states and color consistency really matched the original design well.

🔄 What would you do differently next time?

Next time, I would:

Set up a faster development environment using Vite or Parcel

Write modular components (maybe with React)

Focus more on accessibility and semantic HTML

I also want to learn how to add dark/light theme toggling for future projects.

What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

❗ What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

One of the main challenges was configuring and applying custom fonts using @font-face. It took some trial and error to ensure the fonts loaded correctly across all weights and were picked up by Tailwind's font-family classes. I solved it by double-checking the font file paths and defining both variable and static font families in the CSS.

Another challenge was making sure the design looked consistent across different screen sizes. Initially, the card was too wide on larger screens. I fixed this by applying Tailwind’s max-w-xs and mx-auto classes to constrain width and center the card.

Lastly, getting the hover states and color contrast right was a bit tricky. I used Tailwind's custom color configuration and added manual hover styles in the CSS to achieve the desired interaction.

What specific areas of your project would you like help with?

❗ What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

One of the main challenges was configuring and applying custom fonts using @font-face. It took some trial and error to ensure the fonts loaded correctly across all weights and were picked up by Tailwind's font-family classes. I solved it by double-checking the font file paths and defining both variable and static font families in the CSS.

Another challenge was making sure the design looked consistent across different screen sizes. Initially, the card was too wide on larger screens. I fixed this by applying Tailwind’s max-w-xs and mx-auto classes to constrain width and center the card.

Lastly, getting the hover states and color contrast right was a bit tricky. I used Tailwind's custom color configuration and added manual hover styles in the CSS to achieve the desired interaction.


🙋 Where would you like help or feedback?

Please review the following areas and provide feedback where possible:

  • Font loading: Are the @font-face declarations and font usage optimized for performance and compatibility?

  • Accessibility: Are there areas where I could improve accessibility (e.g., contrast, focus states, alt text, semantic HTML)?

  • Responsiveness: Do all elements adapt well across breakpoints (mobile, tablet, desktop)? Any layout shifts or overflow issues I missed?

  • Tailwind usage: Am I using utility classes efficiently, or could any sections be simplified or improved with better Tailwind practices?

  • Structure and naming: Are my class names and layout structure clean, scalable, and easy to understand for future edits?

  • Font loading: Are my font loading practices optimal for performance?

  • Accessibility: Are there any accessibility improvements I could make (e.g., keyboard navigation, color contrast, semantic HTML)?

  • Responsive behavior: Does the layout scale well on all screen sizes? Are there any issues on tablets or large desktops?

  • Tailwind configuration: Is my use of custom tailwind.config and utility classes clean and efficient?

  • Code structure: Could I organize or name my classes better for clarity and reusability?

  • Font loading: Are my font loading practices optimal for performance?

  • Accessibility: Are there any acce

Code
Loading...

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

No feedback yet. Be the first to give feedback on HepinSuthar's solution.

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord
Frontend Mentor logo

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.