Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted 3 months ago

Responsive social profile card with hover effects

pure-css
Carlos Alberto da Silva•310
@slayer-br
A solution to the Social links profile challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

'm proud of having faithfully followed the layout proposed in the challenge, keeping the design responsive and clean without using any frameworks. The use of CSS variables and a mobile-first structure made the code more organized and easier to maintain.

Next time, I might explore implementing the project using SASS to improve scalability and style reusability.

What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

One of the main challenges was avoiding the scrollbar on larger screens without trimming the content. Initially, the layout caused vertical scrolling due to default margins and how vh units were applied. To solve this, I adjusted the body and html elements and handled spacing more carefully to keep the content centered and fully visible without triggering overflow. Another key point was ensuring accessibility by adding visible :focus states to the links and using appropriate color contrast.

What specific areas of your project would you like help with?

would like to receive feedback on:

  • The semantics and structure of the HTML.

  • The way I centered the content on the screen.

  • The overall accessibility of the page, especially for keyboard navigation.

Code
Select a file

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

  • P
    M Kerr•2,130
    @mkerr-github
    Posted 3 months ago

    As this is a very small project, it's better to give you the general principles about Semantic HTML, so then you know how to use it later on all your projects.

    The main idea of sematic HTML is that instead of us using generic elements like <div> and <span> everywhere (which don’t tell us very much), we should use more semantic HTML elements like:

    • <header> – for the page or section heading
    • <nav> – for the navigation menu
    • <main> – the main content of the page
    • <article> – a self-contained piece of content (like a blog post or news article)
    • <section> – a thematically grouped block of content
    • <footer> – the bottom section (credits, copyright, links)
    • <aside> – tangential content (like a sidebar or a related link)

    These all behave just like a <div> does, but they just describe things better. Before these alternatives to <div> came in, <div> was used all over the place for almost everything.

    Compare sematic tags with a jumble of <div id="thing1"> and <div class="box">

    — Semantic HTML is clearer, cleaner, and better structured.

    Note : <div> can still be used, and often is, there is nothing wrong with using <div>, BUT whenever a more semantic option above is available and more suitable, use that instead.

    If you found anything in this comment helpful:

    Please remember to click the ‘Mark as helpful’ button, thank you!

    Keep up the good work, and keep going! 👋

    Marked as helpful

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub