Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted about 1 month ago

Responsive Testimonials Grid Section using Tailwind CSS

tailwind-css
Amiko Elvis•210
@amikoelvis
A solution to the Testimonials grid section challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

I’m most proud of successfully implementing a responsive layout that seamlessly transitions from a vertical stack on mobile to a 4x2 grid on desktop, using Tailwind CSS’s utilities for Flexbox and CSS Grid. The custom mobile order (Daniel, Jonathan, Jeanette, Patrick, Kira) was a highlight, achieved by reordering the HTML and using md:order-* classes to maintain the desktop grid layout with Kira spanning two rows vertically. This required careful planning to balance mobile and desktop requirements while adhering to the style guide’s colors (e.g., bg-[hsl(263,55%,52%)]) and Barlow Semi Condensed font. The mobile-first approach, with gap-6 for spacing and px-10 py-15 for padding, ensured a polished look across screen sizes, and lazy-loading images (loading="lazy") improved performance.

Next time, I’d focus incorporating accessibility testing (e.g., screen reader compatibility, keyboard navigation) early in the process to meet WCAG standards, and consider adding a footer for attribution to enhance professionalism.

What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

One major challenge was reordering the testimonials for mobile view (placing Kira last) while preserving the desktop grid layout, as the HTML order naturally affects the flexbox stacking but conflicts with the grid’s positioning.

I overcame the ordering challenge by restructuring the HTML to Daniel, Jonathan, Jeanette, Patrick, Kira, and using Tailwind’s md:order-* classes (e.g., md:order-3 for Kira) to reposition cards in the desktop grid, ensuring Kira spanned two rows (md:col-span-1 md:row-span-2).

What specific areas of your project would you like help with?

I’d appreciate feedback on the following: Accessibility: Suggestions for improving WCAG compliance, such as ensuring the layout is screen-reader-friendly and fully navigable via keyboard.

Mobile Spacing: Input on whether reintroducing max-md:mb-6 or adjusting gap-6 would enhance mobile card separation, especially on smaller screens (e.g., 320px).

Code
Select a file

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

No feedback yet. Be the first to give feedback on Amiko Elvis's solution.

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord
Frontend Mentor logo

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit 1st-party linked stylesheets, and styles within <style> tags.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.