Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted about 1 month ago

Responsive Tip calculator app using JavaScript and tailwind CSS

tailwind-css
Amiko Elvis•260
@amikoelvis
A solution to the Tip calculator app challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

I’m proud of implementing a responsive, mobile-first design using Tailwind CSS and creating real-time input validation with JavaScript. The dynamic error handling for the "Number of People" input, showing "Can't be zero" with a red border only when bill and tip are valid, was a key achievement:

javascript

if ((people === 0 || isNaN(people)) && bill > 0 && selectedTip > 0) {
  peopleInput.classList.add('border-red-500');
  peopleError.classList.remove('hidden');
}

What I’d Do Differently Next Time: I’d replace the prompt for custom tip with a text input for better UX and add debouncing to input events to optimize performance. I’d also test CSS class application earlier to avoid issues like the red border not showing.

What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

Challenges Encountered: Red Border Not Showing: The border-red-500 class didn’t apply consistently on the "Number of People" input, likely due to Tailwind CSS conflicts or missing class generation.

NaN in Outputs: When bill and tip were valid but people was 0 or empty, outputs showed NaN instead of $0.00.

Conditional Error Display: Ensuring the "Can't be zero" error only appeared after valid bill and tip inputs, not on page load, was tricky.

How I Overcame Them: Red Border: Added a fallback inline style (peopleInput.style.border = '2px solid rgb(239, 68, 68)') and CSS rule (#people.border-red-500 { border: 2px solid rgb(239, 68, 68) !important; }) to force the border. Ensured border-neutral-grey-50 was toggled off to avoid conflicts.

NaN Issue: Updated calculateTip to check people === 0 || isNaN(people) with bill > 0 and selectedTip > 0, setting outputs to $0.00 early to skip calculations:

javascript

if ((people === 0 || isNaN(people)) && bill > 0 && selectedTip > 0) {
  tipAmountDisplay.textContent = '$0.00';
  totalAmountDisplay.textContent = '$0.00';
}

Error Display: Modified validation to trigger error only when bill and tip were valid, keeping it hidden initially by adding hidden to the error <span> and adjusting logic:

javascript

if ((people === 0 || isNaN(people)) && bill > 0 && selectedTip > 0) {
  peopleError.classList.remove('hidden');
}
What specific areas of your project would you like help with?

I need help ensuring the border-red-500 class applies reliably without fallback inline styles, as it’s still not showing consistently despite Tailwind inclusion. Feedback on optimizing validation logic for edge cases would also be valuable.

Code
Loading...

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

No feedback yet. Be the first to give feedback on Amiko Elvis's solution.

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord
Frontend Mentor logo

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.