Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted 11 months ago

Social Links Profile

P
Aditya Roshadi•50
@aditros
A solution to the Social links profile challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

I like the color

What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

responsive design, I probably need to revisit it later

Code
Select a file

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

  • Robel T. Hawelti•100
    @Rapbit27
    Posted 11 months ago

    Hello Aditya,

    I'm gonna try and put some pointers out there, although I'm not far off from your level, they are advises I got during my previous challenge. Its an exact quote word for word:

    "Your solution looks good on larger screen sizes but not so good on mobile screens. The go-to is to account for screens with a width from 320px up. Your containers use a fixed width, which is generally not good. Let the elements take up the space that they need - that's what makes your site responsive. If you give the outer container and the card a max-width instead of a fixed width, then you should already see what I mean.

    Furthermore I advise you to go through the learning paths here on FEM or reading the MDN documentation about the main rules of semantic HTML. Your site should have a <main> element and since there is no <header> provided by the challenge, you could have just left it out for this one, but the attribution fits perfectly inside a <footer> element (sibling to the <main>)

    Also there are general rules for CSS which you should look at again: Do not declare font-related CSS styles in px, this makes the website inaccessible to people that declared a custom font-size in their browser. Using rem accounts for that.

    Another quick tip from my side, it's generally easier and more common to use (min-width) media queries, so going "mobile-first". On larger layouts you'll have it easier, because stuff just stacks on top of each other in mobile views most of the time. This is the default behavior of block elements. Then you only have to add min-width media queries for larger screens to add the neccessary styles. 😀

    I strongly advise you to go through your code and look at it again to fix at least the stuff I pointed out and also re-test your site with the help of the developer tools of your browser for different screen sizes. You should at least use Firefox and Chrome to ensure it works for most of the users."

    I hope this helps you just as much as I found it helpful, and keep at it!!

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord
Frontend Mentor logo

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub