Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted over 2 years ago

Testimonials section with CSS Grid

maia•300
@maiaflow
A solution to the Testimonials grid section challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


I'm proud of myself for doing mobile first and for figuring out grid for the first time, but by the end I realized I probably should have relied more on things like min-height, and less on things like padding with pixels to make things "pixel perfect" to the screenshot. Even though I know I shouldn't even be trying to do that XD Curious also about how I did with my use of semantic HTML elements!

Code
Select a file

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

  • Lucas 👾•104,160
    @correlucas
    Posted over 2 years ago

    👾Hello Maia, congratulations on your new solution!

    You’re in the right track I can see that you’ve used the majority semantic tags possible for this challenge, the only block you’ve missed is the paragraph containing the quote text you can improve the accessibility there using <blockquote> to indicate to screen readers that the content inside that paragraph is a quote.

    ✌️ I hope this helps you and happy coding!

    Marked as helpful
  • Eric Salvi•1,350
    @ericsalvi
    Posted over 2 years ago

    Hey Maia,

    Another great-looking design from you. 5 in a row!

    I didn't see too much to pick at looking at the rendered solution. The only thing I noticed is that the container of the grid items on the desktop may be missing a max-width. I found that the width of the container of items on the desktop should be 1110px.

    As far as the code itself, I think it looks pretty good. Adriano left a really good comment on things you could try doing in the future. Also, have a look at the Chrome extension called "axe DevTools". I run my code through this tool from the inspector and it generates a validation/accessibilty report I can try to fix before submitting it.

    For your next solution, keep on trying the mobile-first approach but also maybe read up on CSS variables. For larger projects, it really helps.

    Keep up the momentum!

    Marked as helpful
  • Adriano•42,870
    @AdrianoEscarabote
    Posted over 2 years ago

    Hi maia, how are you?

    I really liked the result of your project, but I have some tips that I think you will like:

    1- All page content should be contained by landmarks, you can understand better by clicking here: click here

    We have to make sure that all content is contained in a reference region, designated with HTML5 reference elements or ARIA reference regions.

    Example:

    native HTML5 reference elements:

    <body>
        <header>This is the header</header>
        <nav>This is the nav</nav>
        <main>This is the main</main>
        <footer>This is the footer</footer>
    </body>
    

    ARIA best practices call for using native HTML5 reference elements instead of ARIA functions whenever possible, but the markup in the following example works:

    <body>
         <div role="banner">This is the header</div>
         <div role="navigation">This is the nav</div>
         <div role="main">This is the main</div>
         <div role="contentinfo">This is the footer</div>
    </body>
    

    It is a best practice to contain all content, except skip links, in distinct regions such as header, navigation, main, and footer.

    Link to read more about: click here

    2- Why it Matters

    Navigating the web page is far simpler for screen reader users if all of the content splits between one or more high-level sections. Content outside of these sections is difficult to find, and its purpose may be unclear.

    HTML has historically lacked some key semantic markers, such as the ability to designate sections of the page as the header, navigation, main content, and footer. Using both HTML5 elements and ARIA landmarks in the same element is considered a best practice, but the future will favor HTML regions as browser support increases.

    Rule Description

    It is a best practice to ensure that there is only one main landmark to navigate to the primary content of the page and that if the page contains iframe elements, each should either contain no landmarks, or just a single landmark.

    Link to read more about: click here

    Prefer to use rem over px to have your page working better across browsers and resizing the elements properly

    The rest is great!!

    Hope it helps...👍

  • Yui•50
    @yterai
    Posted over 2 years ago

    Great work Maia, you nailed it! I should definitely practice more using semantics elements like yours - thanks for a good example :) And kudos to you for doing all the challenges it's a huge commitment!

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord
Frontend Mentor logo

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub