Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted almost 3 years ago

Trying Responsive Design

MFA34•50
@mfa34
A solution to the Product preview card component challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


I had a hard time doing the desktop design for the first time.

I think that there is no fluent transition in my design because I use units like em and rem where I am not sure in my code.

If u want u can help me to use responsive units like a rem em vw vh . Thanks for eveyone .

Code
Couldn’t fetch repository

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

  • Adriano•42,890
    @AdrianoEscarabote
    Posted almost 3 years ago

    Hi MFA34, how are you?

    I really liked the result of your project, but I have some tips that I think you will like:

    1- Every page should have one main landmark <main>. So replace the div that wraps the whole content with <main> to improve the accessibility. click here

    2- All page content should be contained by landmarks, you can understand better by clicking here: click here

    We have to make sure that all content is contained in a reference region, designated with HTML5 reference elements or ARIA reference regions.

    Example:

    native HTML5 reference elements:

    <body>
        <header>This is the header</header>
        <nav>This is the nav</nav>
        <main>This is the main</main>
        <footer>This is the footer</footer>
    </body>
    

    ARIA best practices call for using native HTML5 reference elements instead of ARIA functions whenever possible, but the markup in the following example works:

    <body>
         <div role="banner">This is the header</div>
         <div role="navigation">This is the nav</div>
         <div role="main">This is the main</div>
         <div role="contentinfo">This is the footer</div>
    </body>
    

    It is a best practice to contain all content, except skip links, in distinct regions such as header, navigation, main, and footer.

    Link to read more about: click here

    2- Why it Matters

    Navigating the web page is far simpler for screen reader users if all of the content splits between one or more high-level sections. Content outside of these sections is difficult to find, and its purpose may be unclear.

    HTML has historically lacked some key semantic markers, such as the ability to designate sections of the page as the header, navigation, main content, and footer. Using both HTML5 elements and ARIA landmarks in the same element is considered a best practice, but the future will favor HTML regions as browser support increases.

    Rule Description

    It is a best practice to ensure that there is only one main landmark to navigate to the primary content of the page and that if the page contains iframe elements, each should either contain no landmarks, or just a single landmark.

    Link to read more about: click here

    Prefer to use rem over px to have your page working better across browsers and resizing the elements properly

    The rest is great!!

    Hope it helps...👍

    Marked as helpful
  • SrHatcher•710
    @SrHatcher
    Posted almost 3 years ago

    hello @MFA34! Your result is great, don't worry! something that i learned by doing projects is that the harder they are the more you can learn from them. here are some suggestions and advices i can tell you:

    if you start coding from mobile version you'll see that it'll be easier for you to code the desktop version. your CSS file reads the code from up to down, so you can write the mobile styles first without a "@media", and once you finished the mobile version you can create a "@media" for the desktop version.

    Another thing i would suggest you is try to use less divs, look for a way to make the same project but using less of them, it's a very good practice that will increase your skills!

    i would recommend you to use BEM to name your CSS classes and use descriptives names like "product-container" for example, that will make them easier to understand where they belong.

    Also, when an element is inside another container, you can use percentage measures to make sure that the element inside fit the container, you can use "with: 100%" in the class "box-1" to make sure the element will always fit the container.

    there's a difference between em and rem, i recommend you to read this https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/difference-between-em-and-rem-units-in-css/ . personally, i only use REM for fonts.

    vw and vh (view-width and view-height) are usually used for containers that depend on the size of the device. so knowning this you can use them whenever you see it'll be useful.

    you can see the projects from other users to compare and learn new things from them, i'm sure that will be very helpful. Nice work and keep going!

    Marked as helpful
  • Account deletedPosted almost 3 years ago

    Hey, great job on this project!

    Just checked out your card and it is responsive, just not 100% responsive.

    To fix, do the following:

    • For the width in your container class it is better to use the max-width

    • When using images that are different size for different breakpoints, its’ far more effective to use the <picture> element. By using this element not are able to use different size images, you can also save on bandwidth, meaning your content loads faster.

    Syntax:

      <picture>
        <source media="(min-width: )" srcset="">
        <img src="" alt="">
      </picture>
    

    Source:

    https://www.w3schools.com/html/html_images_picture.asp

    https://web.dev/learn/design/picture-element/

    • To make you content accessible to your users, it is a best to use rem/em instead of px for your CSS property values. For media queries, I definitely suggest using em for them. By using px your assuming that every users browser (mobile, tablet, laptop/desktop) is using a font size of 16px (this is the default size on browser). Em's will help with users whose default isn't 16px, which can sometimes cause the your content to overflow and negatively affect your layout.

    Sources:

    https://betterprogramming.pub/px-em-or-rem-examining-media-query-units-in-2021-e00cf37b91a9

    https://uxdesign.cc/why-designers-should-move-from-px-to-rem-and-how-to-do-that-in-figma-c0ea23e07a15

    Happy Coding!

    Marked as helpful
  • Lucas 👾•104,160
    @correlucas
    Posted almost 3 years ago

    👾Hello @mfa34, Congratulations on completing this challenge!

    Your solution its almost done and I’ve some tips to help you to improve it:

    1.Use a CSS reset to avoid all the problems you can have with the default CSS setup, removing all margins, and making the images easier to work, see the article below where you can copy and paste this CSS code cheatsheet: https://piccalil.li/blog/a-modern-css-reset/

    2.Add transitions to make the interaction smoother while the element gets hovered, you can use a value like transition: all ease-in 0.5s.

    3.Using <picture> you’ve more control over the elements and its better than using the product image as <img> or background-image. Look that for SEO and search engine reasons it isn't a better practice to import this product image with CSS since this will make it harder to the image. You can manage both images inside the <picture> tag and use the html to code to set when the images should change setting the device max-width depending of the device (phone / computer) Here’s a guide about how to use picture: https://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_picture.asp

    ✌️ I hope this helps you and happy coding!

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub