Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted 7 months ago

Results summary component using HTML and CSS

accessibility, pure-css, web-components, webflow, animation
Caleb Abuul•320
@Caleb-Abuul
A solution to the Results summary component challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

I am most proud of the fact that I wrote the entire code for this challenge without seeking for external assistance. Which means I have significantly improved in my frontend development journey. I find the challenge quite simple enough. So, I planned on the design, and used only HTML5 and CSS to complete the challenge.

What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

One of the challenges I encountered was that the content of one of the div was shrinking while the other remained the same as the screen size reduced. It turned out that I had used viewport values for its size i.e 60vw. So I changed it to percentage - 60%.

What specific areas of your project would you like help with?

I am comfortable with my project right now, however, if there is anything I could do better I'd really love to know.

Code
Select a file

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

  • P
    Huy Phan•3,430
    @huyphan2210
    Posted 7 months ago

    Hi, @Caleb-Abuul

    I checked out your solution and I have some thoughts:

    • "Your Result" Section: It seems the height of this section shrinks on viewports 1024px wide or larger. This is due to an invalid grid-template-rows value in the media query. You can fix this by setting grid-template-rows: unset, which will help avoid the current setting of grid-template-rows: 40% 60% that's used for mobile viewports.
    • HTML and Body Sizing: Setting width: 100vw on body and html isn’t necessary since these are block-level elements that already fill the full width. Also, consider using min-height: 100vh instead of height: 100vh on body to ensure content expands appropriately on all screens.
    • Semantic HTML: You’re already using main and footer tags, which is great! To improve accessibility and structure further, try replacing generic divs with more descriptive tags like section or article where relevant.

    Hope this helps!

    Marked as helpful

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord
Frontend Mentor logo

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SASS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub