Skip to content
  • Unlock Pro
  • Log in with GitHub
Solution
Submitted 3 months ago

Social links profile using tailwindcss, next.js, flexbox

next, react, tailwind-css
P
BlonoBuccellati•310
@BlonoBuccellati
A solution to the Social links profile challenge
View live sitePreview (opens in new tab)View codeCode (opens in new tab)

Solution retrospective


What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

The speed at which I build UIs is increasing, and I am now able to make finer adjustments.

By the third project, I have finally gained enough confidence to consider various aspects, such as which components should have explicit size specifications and which should not.

What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

Even after building the UI, I was unable to make fine adjustments. This was because I needed to specify the line height using leading-normal instead of relying on the default line height.

In this project, I identified and resolved the issue by carefully inspecting each element with DevTools to find discrepancies.

What specific areas of your project would you like help with?

I would like to understand which elements should have explicit size specifications.

In this project, I assigned a specific size to the Card, specified the height for the button, and set its width to w-full.

The reason behind this approach is that child elements should adapt to their parent elements. However, I also considered that buttons should maintain a consistent height regardless of their parent, which is why I explicitly set the height for them.

Does this approach align with best practices? Additionally, is my CSS implementation appropriate?

If you have any insights, I would greatly appreciate it.

Code
Select a file

Please log in to post a comment

Log in with GitHub

Community feedback

  • P
    Boris•4,110
    @makogeboris
    Posted 3 months ago

    Great work, generally speaking you shouldn't explicitly set fixed sizes on elements (except for images when necessary) as this can create problems with responsiveness and content fit. Instead, let the content and padding determine the element’s size. If necessary, use max-width or min-height, and prefer relative units like rem for better adaptability.

    • Your card should have a max-width in rem and no height.
    • For the buttons use padding to determine its size not height and to improve the semantic meaning of these links, you should use the a tag instead of the button tag. The a tag is used for navigation to other pages, while the button tag is designed for interactive actions like submitting forms or for events like toggling content. Also, using an unordered list ul to group the links is a better approach for both semantics and accessibility.
    • All content should be wrapped within landmarks. Wrap a main tag around the card

    Hope this helps, Good luck!

    Marked as helpful

Join our Discord community

Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!

Join our Discord
Frontend Mentor logo

Stay up to datewith new challenges, featured solutions, selected articles, and our latest news

Frontend Mentor

  • Unlock Pro
  • Contact us
  • FAQs
  • Become a partner

Explore

  • Learning paths
  • Challenges
  • Solutions
  • Articles

Community

  • Discord
  • Guidelines

For companies

  • Hire developers
  • Train developers
© Frontend Mentor 2019 - 2025
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • License

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub

How does the accessibility report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use axe-core to run an automated audit of your code.

This picks out common accessibility issues like not using semantic HTML and not having proper heading hierarchies, among others.

This automated audit is fairly surface level, so we encourage to you review the project and code in more detail with accessibility best practices in mind.

How does the CSS report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use stylelint to run an automated check on the CSS code.

We've added some of our own linting rules based on recommended best practices. These rules are prefixed with frontend-mentor/ which you'll see at the top of each issue in the report.

The report will audit all CSS, SCSS and Less files in your repository.

How does the HTML validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use html-validate to run an automated check on the HTML code.

The report picks out common HTML issues such as not using headings within section elements and incorrect nesting of elements, among others.

Note that the report can pick up “invalid” attributes, which some frameworks automatically add to the HTML. These attributes are crucial for how the frameworks function, although they’re technically not valid HTML. As such, some projects can show up with many HTML validation errors, which are benign and are a necessary part of the framework.

How does the JavaScript validation report work?

When a solution is submitted, we use eslint to run an automated check on the JavaScript code.

The report picks out common JavaScript issues such as not using semicolons and using var instead of let or const, among others.

The report will audit all JS and JSX files in your repository. We currently do not support Typescript or other frontend frameworks.

Oops! 😬

You need to be logged in before you can do that.

Log in with GitHub